Wednesday 1 October 2014

Virtuous Circles – a trillion dollar business opportunity that might help save Society

I was quite surprised the other day when an American friend, who is quite active on climate and environment issues, responded to my references to the Circular Economy with 'what's that?'

Since a good proportion of this blog's readers (by the analytics) come from the USA, and since it is anyway a growing, rather than a well-understood concept/practice, I thought a quick introduction might be helpful.

Because the idea is, to my eyes, an important one. As Walter Stahel, the person accredited with first defining 'cradle-to-cradle' industrial process models describes it, this is a paradigm shift in the way we not only do business, but also in the way we understand our relationship with the world as an economically active society.

The basic ideas behind it are summarised on wikipedia, here. The idea is that products and services are designed from the outset to cycle back into their own production processes, creating a system which replicates Nature, by turning what was once called 'waste' into 'reusable material'. It is a long way, almost the opposite to, the idea of a Consumption Economy, which takes resources, makes products (with built in redundancy), then dumps the cast-off.

Not only is a Circular economy (and businesses operating on circular economy principles) hugely better for the planet (since finite resources are used much more efficiently, vastly reducing the dependence on new resource exploitation), but it is also potentially hugely profitable, to the tune of perhap a trillion dollars added to the value of the Global Economy. This alone makes it worth exploring more deeply.

One of the current champions and leaders in the field is a foundation with an implausible central figure, the gamine, 5'2" heroine of global sailing, Dame Ellen Macarthur. There is a nice article on her and her work on euronews, here.

In 2010, this extraordinary person, having conquered the World's oceans and broken numerous records along the way, and having become the youngest Dame in modern history and a Companion of the Legion d'Honneur, put competitive sailing to one side and launched the Ellen Macarthur Foundation (here), designed to promote a Circular economy.

So, some basic resources for you, if your interest is piqued:

 This provides a summary of the main ideas and links to other material.

http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/business/reports is a core set of reports, compiled with McKinsey, giving detailed information and a considerable amount of inspiration - all three reports are free to download.

http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/circular-economy is one example of a media outlet, The Guardian (UK), both supporting and informing on various initiatives and actions around the World.

The underlying principles are powerful enough that the EU, by 2012, announced that it would be looking at using these concepts to inform future policy decisions. Perhaps it is time in the USA for similar initiative and corporate engagement.

Why this, here, now? Because we are fairly clear that Business as Usual is a really, really, bad idea, for Nature, the environment, poor people, climate change, social order and the future of human society - and this is more than an idea, it is a considered and sophisticated new operating model for a sustainable and healthier society, which might help us turn the corner from what looks like an impending crisis, with real world examples, case histories, financial analysis and substantial corporate engagement.

Hopefully, this will have given you some reason to hope - yes, I think we do need an international agreement to mitigate CO2 emissions, but I also think that our resourcefulness and initiative will move us, step by step, towards the goal of a better kind of world, on the way.



8 comments:

  1. I hope you will pursue this idea, which needs a whole lot more attention from the world at large. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, I will try to keep up to date on this here at the blog.
    It is often hard to assess the impact of new organisations in the field of sustainable business; so much of what comes out is formed by good intentions but perverted by pragmatics.
    The other difficulty is that many of the 'celebrity-led' initiatives (plenty of examples), start well, but drift out of attention once the early media interest fades. This one seems different for a couple of reasons, the most important being that there is some very good source material on which the practices are based, and a decent level of buy-in from several large international organisations.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Been trying something like this forabit. Grow oilseeds and crush into oil and meal. (In this context, corn is an oilseed.) Feed the meal to livestock, rent the oil to restaurants. Collect the oil back, clean it out. Residues/water/FFA drops out, is acidic, compost on alkaline fields, or blend into animal feeds. Turn the clean oil into biodiesel, and glycerine. Burn the glycerine for process heat or make soap. If i ran the entire thing on biodiesel, it would use about 1/3 production.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Sidd, thanks for turning up. This is a neat example of 'circular thinking' - notably much more resource-efficient than alternatives and consequently with a greater control of the product cycle and opportunity for net profit.
      For me, one of the strong points of the Foundation is the information sharing network, which seems to operate as a mechanism for fine tuning and improving already 'virtuous' operations.

      Delete
  4. Some more things: Land needs in pasture about a third of the time. Alfalfa,clover, for N, timothy fescue and such. Some needs to be wooded. Animals are essential on the farm, not only for fertilizer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like it's fairly close to self-sufficiency: is the wood capable of being managed for a domestic-scale CHP system, such as a back-boiler stove?
      What utilities or services are needed which cannot be supplied internally, apart from a phone line?
      The other thought is that this sounds rather more labor-intensive than most 'city folk' might be comfortable with?

      Delete
  5. No sir. Very far from self sufficient. Granted, in the event of apocalypse, that valley (approx 1 kilofamily) would not starve, but would be very very hard.

    Example: Tractor tires. Ya we got all the old tools in the barn, so do many of our neighbours, big ol moldboards, wagons, threshers, scythes ... can be repaired onsite, but manhours required to go back to them would be brutal.

    Many Amish about, they always help everybody, even the "English" as outsiders are known, they are closest to self sufficiency. Some of them do steel tires, but need horses for muddy work.

    Regarding heat: Last time i checked we had 2 oilfired hotwater, one oilfired forced air, one woodfired stove propane stove, assorted electric heat in operation. For backup, I think i saw oilfired hotwater heater and 3 cast iron woodstoves lurking in various barns and outbuildings. All the oilfired stuff can run biodiesel.

    Utilities: Electric, phone, phone internet, satellite internet. Wells for water, septic systems for sewers. Got (bio) diesel backup and gasoline backup electric. Propane is delivered, but havent really used much of it. Once a year in 275gal tank if that.

    Wood: dont need more wood than naturally comes down. havent needed to look at woodgas yet, or methane production from animal shit. A neighbor runs about 800 pigs, has a 28 Kw methane genset but i think it is broke lately. Can be fixed, i suppose...

    sidd

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The presence of the Amish suggests you are in Ohio, Pennsylvania or Indiana.
      Few people seem to realise the great significance of technological development in transforming agriculture over time. Without it, working land is tough work, unrelenting and unforgiving. But somehow the Amish manage it.
      The point is that any effort to manage a 'carbon footprint' and thus reduce emissions is a step in the right direction.

      Delete

What do you think?